DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) Priorities

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA)


Statement of Regulatory Priorities

To comply with the National Performance Review (NPR) directive to achieve regulatory reform, the Department of Agriculture is continuing an extremely important project to eliminate unnecessary regulations and improve all those remaining by making them easier to understand and more user friendly. To date the Department's review and revision effort has resulted in actions on over 50 percent of our NPR committment to regulatory reform. When the results are fully implemented, the Department will have eliminated or reinvented 81 percent of its regulatory holdings in the CFR.

Positive changes resulting from regulatory actions proposed as well as completed by the Department will reach into every corner of the country and, both directly and indirectly, touch the lives of most Americans. Those programs that offer support to specific rural and urban segments of the economy are being simplified so that persons who qualify for assistance, or some other form of participation, will find less burdensome rules. Yet high standards will be set for efficient and effective program management that makes the best use of taxpayer dollars. Farmers, ranchers, and others involved in U.S. agriculture will find significant changes in all aspects of regulations that govern their interaction with the Department and its programs. Farm credit, a mainstay of the Nation's rural economy, will be significantly streamlined by the merger of cumbersome loan-making regulations with forms and certifications simplified to facilitate the application process. The Department is undertaking a number of actions in the regulation of commodities that will increase efficiency, improve customer service, reduce intervention in markets, and allow States to assume greater responsibility in controlling the spread of plant pests or disease. The Department is also improving the regulations that serve rural communities. Several changes are being made in the rural housing programs. Nutrition programs are also being strengthened, their efficiency improved, and their integrity enhanced through regulatory reform. In the area of food safety, the Department has undertaken a significant reinvention of all policies and relationships with industry and the public. There are several important reinvention plans in the natural resources and conservation area.

The Role of Regulations

The programs of the Department are diverse and far reaching, as are the regulations that attend their delivery. Regulations codify how the Department will conduct its business, including the specifics of access to, and eligibility for, USDA programs. Regulations also specify the behavior of State and local governments, private industry, businesses, and individuals that is necessary to comply with their provisions. The diversity in purpose and outreach of our programs contributes significantly to the USDA being at or near the top of the list of Departments that produce the largest number of regulations annually. These regulations range from nutrition standards for the school lunch program, to natural resource and environmental measures governing national forest usage and soil conservation, to regulations protecting American agribusiness (the largest dollar value contributor to exports) from the ravages of domestic or foreign plant or animal pestilence and they extend from farm to supermarket to ensure the safety, quality, and availability of the Nation's food supply. Many regulations function in a dynamic environment which requires their periodic modification. The factors determining various entitlement, eligibility, and administrative criteria often change from year to year. Therefore, many significant regulations must be revised annually to reflect changes in economic and market benchmarks. Almost all legislation that affects Departmental programs has accompanying regulatory needs, often with a significant impact. The recently enacted Farm Bill, Public Law 104-127, has considerable regulatory consequences. This key legislation affects most agencies of USDA and will result in the addition of new programs, the deletion of others, and modification to still others.

Administration Guidance--USDA Response

In developing and implementing regulations, the Department has been guided by the regulatory principles and philosophy set forth by the President in Executive Order 12866 ``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' As prescribed in the Order, the USDA is committed to ``promulgate only those regulations that are required by law, are necessary to interpret the law, or are made necessary by compelling public need.'' When considering a rulemaking action, the Department will assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, including the alternative of not regulating. Our analysis will consider the costs and benefits of both quantifiable and qualitative measures, and opt for approaches that maximize net benefits.

Major Regulatory Priorities

Five agencies are represented in this regulatory plan. They are the Farm Service Agency (which includes the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation), the Food and Consumer Service, the Forest Service, the Food Safety Inspection Service, and the Rural Business Cooperative Development Service.

This document represents summary information on prospective significant regulations as called for in Executive Order 12866. A brief comment on each of the five agencies appears below, which summarizes the agency mission and its key regulatory priorities. The agency summaries are followed by the regulatory plan entries.

Farm Service Agency

Mission: The Farm Service Agency (FSA) administers farm commodity, conservation, commodity purchase, crop insurance, and farm loan programs, as prescribed by various statutes, in order to support farming certainty and flexibility while ensuring compliance with farm conservation and wetland protection requirements and to assist owners and operators of farms and ranches to conserve and enhance soil, water, and related natural resources.

Priorities: FSA's priorities for 1997 will be to continue to implement these programs and to implement the many revisions to the farm program regulations that were identified by the President's Regulatory Review Initiative. The most significant FSA regulations are those that implement crop and commodity programs and farm loans. FSA administers commodity loan programs for wheat, rice, grain, sorghum barley, oats, oilseeds, tobacco, peanuts, upland and extra long staple cotton and sugar. The programs for wheat, feed grains, rice and upland cotton were significantly changed by the 1996 Farm Bill, which instituted production flexibility contracts in place of the deficiency payments and production adjustment of past programs. The contracts removed the link between income support payments and farm prices by providing for seven annual fixed but declining payments. FSA's farm loan programs provide farm ownership, operating, emergency loss and rural youth loans to help farmers who are temporarily unable to obtain private, commercial credit. While the commodity and farm loan programs have significant economic impact, they are driven by specific statutory requirements. Therefore, they are noted here to acknowledge their significance in the overall USDA regulatory plan but are not further listed in the body of the plan which appears below.

Food and Consumer Service

Mission: The Food and Consumer Service (FCS) provides children and needy families access to a more healthful diet through its food assistance programs and comprehensive nutrition education efforts.

Priorities: In addition to responding to recently enacted provisions for welfare reform, FCS has established broad strategic policy goals that are enabled and/or supported by the Agency's regulatory agenda. These goals include:

  • Healthful diets for children through the National School Lunch and Breakfast Program School Meals Initiative for Healthy Children. USDA created and is continuing to develop Team Nutrition, an innovative network of public and private partnerships to promote food choices through schools, families, communities and the media.

  • Enhanced food and nutrition security for low-income Americans by providing assistance through the Food Stamp Program, improving program administration to meet the needs of the 1990s, including improved program integrity and efficiency, expansion of electronic benefit transfer (EBT), and initiating Team Nutrition concepts into the Food Stamp Program as appropriate to program participants and their communities.

  • Improved nutritional status and health of low-income women, infants and children through the WIC Program by further emphasizing nutrition education and healthy infant feeding practices, incorporating Team Nutrition concepts while seeking to enhance program integrity through improved monitoring of vendors and exploration of the use of electronic benefit transfer (EBT).

  • Improved nutritional status of low-income, pre-school children through the Child and Adult Care Food Program by expanding technical assistance to day care providers in improving nutritional quality of program meals in relation to the Dietary Guidelines and Recommended Dietary Guidelines, incorporating Team Nutrition concepts and materials to introduce nutrition education to children at an early age, and identifying and encouraging potential sponsors of program services to low-income children.

  • Low-income children consume nutritious lunches when school meals are not available. The Summer Food Service Program will be examined in relation to all other FCS food programs and will be included as an extension of the School Meals Initiative for Healthy Children gaining technical assistance for planning nutritious meals and adaptation of Team Nutrition concepts for providing nutrition education in non-school settings.

  • Improved quality of food distribution commodities and service in continuing support for agricultural markets with emphasis on more healthful commodities including fruits and vegetables and improved program efficiency through automation, reduced Federal and State inventories and timely deliveries in FCS food distribution programs.

    Forest Service

    Mission: The mission of the Forest Service is to achieve quality land management, under the sustainable multiple-use management concept, to meet the diverse needs of people. It includes:

  • Advocating a conservation ethic in promoting the health, productivity, diversity, and beauty of forests and associated lands;

  • Listening to people and responding to their diverse needs, in making decisions;

  • Protecting and managing the National Forests and Grasslands so they best demonstrate the sustainable multiple-use management concept;

  • Providing technical and financial assistance to State and private forest landowners, encouraging them to practice good stewardship and quality land management in meeting their specific objectives;

  • Providing technical and financial assistance to cities and communities to improve their natural environment by planting trees and caring for their forests;

  • Providing international technical assistance and scientific exchanges to sustain and enhance global resources and to encourage quality land management;

  • Helping States and communities to wisely use the forests to promote rural economic development and a quality rural environment;

  • Developing and providing scientific and technical knowledge aimed at improving our capability to protect, manage, and use forests and rangelands; and

  • Providing work, training, and education to the unemployed, underemployed, elderly, youth, and disadvantaged, in pursuit of our mission.

    Priorities: The President's environmental program includes efforts to incorporate the principles of ecosystem management in natural resource decisionmaking on the National Forests. In support of that effort, final regulations will be published governing the amendment, revision, and implementation of forest land management plans. Significantly, the regulation will also streamline the planning process and update planning procedures and requirements in order to reflect court decisions and the Agency's experience gained with the first generation of forest plans.

    Food Safety and Inspection Service

    Mission: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is responsible for ensuring the Nation's meat, poultry, and egg products are safe, wholesome, and properly packaged and labeled.

    Priorities: FSIS is carrying out a comprehensive review of its existing regulations in light of the July 25, 1996, final rule, ``Pathogen Reduction Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) Systems,'' requiring that official meat and poultry establishments develop and implement HACCP, a science-based process control system for food safety. Establishments will be responsible for developing and implementing HACCP plans incorporating the controls they have determined are necessary and appropriate to produce safe products. HACCP places the responsibility for food safety firmly on meat and poultry establishments, but enables them to tailor their control systems to the needs of particular plants and processes and to take advantage of the latest technological innovations.

    FSIS must revise its existing regulations to be consistent with HACCP principles. Many are ``command-and-control'' regulations, prescribing the exact means establishments must use to ensure the safety of their products. Some specify, for example, precise cooking time-and-temperature combinations. Further, many of these regulations require prior approval of equipment and procedures by FSIS, therefore assigning the Agency responsibility for the means used by establishments to comply with the regulations. As a general matter, command-and-control regulations are incompatible with HACCP because they deprive plants of the flexibility to innovate and undercut the clear delineation of responsibility for food safety. Therefore, to prepare for the implementation of HACCP, FSIS is conducting a thorough review of its current regulations and, to the maximum extent possible, converting its command-and-control regulations to performance standards. Some of the Agency's recent and planned initiatives, both to convert command-and-control regulations to performance standards and to generally streamline and simplify the regulations, follow:

  • FSIS has proposed to convert to performance standards the current regulations governing the production of cooked beef products, uncured meat patties, and certain poultry products.

  • FSIS has proposed to eliminate prior approval requirements for blueprints, equipment, and most partial-quality control programs used in meat and poultry establishments.

  • FSIS has issued a final rule that eliminates unnecessary duplication in the prior labeling approval system.

  • FSIS will be proposing to streamline, consolidate, and make consistent with HACCP the rules of practice regarding suspension and withdrawal of inspection.

  • FSIS will be seeking comment and information on how to simplify and revise the standards of identity and composition for meat and poultry products in light of Agency budget constraints, as well as changing markets and consumer expectations. FSIS must reform this regulatory program while continuing to prevent economic adulteration or misbranding of meat and poultry products.

  • FSIS, in conjunction with the Food and Drug Administration, will be seeking comment and information on the need for storage and transporation requirements for food capable of supporting the growth of pathonogenic microorganisms.

    Rural Business-Cooperative Development Service

    Mission: The mission of RBCDS is to enhance the quality of life for all rural Americans by providing leadership in building competitive businesses and cooperatives that can prosper in the global trading marketplace.

    Priority: Despite decades of investments in infrastructure and business development, rural America continues to face many significant challenges. Some of the challenges, like the persistence of poverty in major parts of the South and in Appalachia, have been with us for a long time. Others, such as the loss of jobs and businesses from rural economies, are due to changes in the structure of rural economic bases and the globalization of competition.

    The primary goals of RBCDS regulatory changes are to economize in the use of public resources while making the programs more effective at rural community economic development and more customer friendly. New or revised regulations will generally be shorter, better organized, and clearer than the current regulations for the same programs, and program requirements will be more flexible.